![]() Chris Esaki, the game's creative director, shared details on how Forza Motorsport’s physics have evolved from Forza Motorsport 7 during a Forza Monthly stream (opens in new tab) in May 2021. For starters, it'll be a "huge generational leap" over previous games. I can see that the TexStudio ppa "recommends" textlive, which if I understand correctly, will be the repo version.Forza Motorsport looks like a racing sim as pure as they come, providing a big update on what Forza Motorsport 7 offered. unless TexStudio itself is the culprit? Does TexStudio have a dependency on the repo version of texlive? I updated from the ppa. Curious that the problem manifested itself at the same time as I updated TextStudio. But this has clearly sneaked past me at some point. I have absolutely definitely not installed the repo version of texlive myself because I know having two simultaneous versions causes problems. This has happened before where a package has added a dependence on latex which usually results in an update of the package trying to install the repo version of texlive. I'll continue to work on this because it is a nuisance.Īre there any paths (which might apply) to bst files set anywhere in TexStudio's many options?Īh! Great spot! In fact, thinking back I have a similar problem before.Īfter investigation, it seems that the 2019 version of texlive, which comes in the Ubuntu repo, has become installed. (I posted the log file from this build previously.) I can still build the pdf from the shell, which implies that my texlive is still working properly.I was halfway through writing the paper when I upgraded to v4.3.1.(In my experience, things can sometimes reconfigure themselves spontaneously on Linux.) In particular: ![]() ![]() I suppose it is possible that my tex installation threw some strange aberration at just the same time as I upgraded to v4.3.1 of TexStudio - stranger things happen at sea! But all the evidence seems to point at something has gone wrong with my TexStudio configuration. I am not so sure about the "it's a tex issue" explanation. When I copy the bst file into the same directory, it works, which suggests the issue lies solely with finding the bst file. Is bibtex failing to find the bib file (which is in the same directory) or is it failing to find the bst file? I am not clear from the log files. the important point is why bibtex does not find the bib and there I can only speculate. but this is not very elegant since it already exists in the default texlive tree (which, of course, is why I can build from the shell!). Maybe somebody with a deeper understanding of Latex can spot what is going wrong from the log files?Īs I have pointed out, simply copying the IEEEtran.bst file into the directory allows TexStudio to work properly. Running these two log files through diff shows differences starting around 359 indicating some issues with the two references. The second log file "shell-New." is what results from successfully building the pdf from the shell by invoking pdltatex, bibtex, and pdflatex twice more. I also include two log files: the one named "New." is what is generated by building within TexStudio this build fails by not resolving the references. I have also had to hack the extension for the minimal bib file for the same reason. Note that I have had to rename the tex file as 'txt' because github does seem to allow the upload of tex files. Herewith an MWE based on an edited down version of the IEEE Transactions template example.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |